Why read the Bible? Is it really God’s Words?
First and foremost, the Scriptures are central to the Revelation of God to mankind. St. Gregory of Nyssa wrote, “Divinely inspired Scripture, as the Divine Apostle calls it, is the Holy Spirit’s writing. Its purpose is usefulness to men. ‘All Scripture,’ he says, ‘is inspired of God and useful.’ (2 Tim 3:16)”. That is why the Holy Bible is important to the Apostolic Catholic Church. The Churches of God guard them so carefully. We as Christians venerate it and consider it sacred – holy, and read it during the services. Those few words provide us, with a gently understated picture of how the Church views the Holy Bible. The importance of this reverential regard for the Bible and its use cannot, be overstated; for it helps us understand why properly reading and interpreting it is a very sensitive matter. That is because it is inspired by God. Remember the words of St. John the Apostle in the first chapter of the Gospel according to St. John, “In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.” (John 1:1).
The Early Church Fathers project a specifically humble and positive attitude toward the Holy Bible, accepting them as the word of God, inspired by God the Holy Spirit, Mahal na Ingkong. They consistently followed the interpretation which has been traditionally accepted in the Church from the beginning. Nowadays, there are so called philosophers, historians and others (who called themselves theologians) who criticize and interpret the Holy Scriptures without regards to the traditions and doctrines of the church, even ignoring and disdaining this traditions and doctrines. This is not to be, because the Church has held throughout the centuries the knowledge of the Scriptures, and only through the Church by the guidance of the Holy Spirit that all truth and revelation of God has been handed down since the Apostles.
St. Theophilus of Antioch wrote, “Moreover, in regard to the righteousness which the law enjoined, the Prophets and the Gospels are found to be consistent with each other, because they all spoke as being inspired by the one Spirit of God”. St. Iranaeus of Lyons writes, “If, however, we are not able to find explanations for all those passages which are investigated, we ought to not on that account seek for another God beside Him who exists. This would be the greatest impiety. Things of that kind we must leave to God, the One who made us, knowing full well that the Scriptures are certainly perfect, since they were spoken by the Word of God and by His Spirit.”
Guarding our faith and its foundation, the source of all doctrine and traditions, is the gift of God, His Revelation. St. Paul said, “But God has revealed them to us through His Spirit. For the Spirit searches all things, yes, and the deep things of God. For what man knows the things of a man except the spirit of the man which is in him? Even so no one knows the things of God except the Spirit of God.” (1 Cor. 2:10-11). And again, “No man can say Jesus is Lord, but by the Holy Spirit” (1 Cor. 12:3).
What does the Bible mean to your faith and to whom it is written for?
The Bible was written long ago over a span of a thousand years by people who belonged to a culture far different from ours and who spoke languages we do not understand. The Bible uses literary forms that vary greatly from ours. Many of the most important words of the Bible were spoken in one language, written down in another, and translated into a third. Small wonder then that we have problems discerning the meaning of the Bible.
It is the belief of the Apostolic Catholic Church and the two mainstream denominations (Roman and Orthodox Churches), plus many other Christian denominations that the Bible also has God as its author. There is a degree of reliability in the Scriptures. But how can God and man be both authors of the Holy Bible? The Churches position is that God inspired the human authors of the Bible to write the books, using ones own talents, style and abilities. Therefore, we can best understand by simply going back to time and place (Knowledge of science and history) of its human author and discovering what that author intended to express.
The interpretation of the Bible must be studied (under the Church’s interpretation) in order to discern the meaning of the Bible, which words alone cannot give us the full knowledge. The passage of thousand of years and the fact it was written in other languages for people of different times and cultures mean that the study and interpretation is necessary if we want to gain the proper understanding of God’s Word.
The underlined and highlighted (in bold) words, constitutes what we call the “Bible Study Considerations”. In studying the Bible one must consider the following:
Scholarly research:
Correctly interpreting the Bible is the most important thing to consider. This idea sometimes makes some people who study the Bible a little bit uneasy. Nowadays, readers are saturated of different ways of interpreting the Bible. Previous interpretations may not be the same in today’s current interpretation. It seams like that because of this different interpretations that the Bible can be like just a story or a myth. But the truth of the Bible is or still being understood, and discoveries in fields that are important in studying the Bible has just been recently being uncovered. These discoveries by scholars are in the fields of language, archeology, and history.
- Language – Thousands of documents unknown since Biblical times are still being rediscovered. Records of the ancient languages from the cradle of civilization in the Middle East have enabled scholars to decipher way of writing and thinking. For example, the discovery of the Dead Sea scrolls made scholars aware of new developments of the Old and New Testaments. In these sense they are able to increase our knowledge of the Bible.
- Archeology – The science of archeology have improved and advanced because of latest technology and discoveries. This shed new light on the Bible. Ancient monuments and cities have been discovered and are being studied. Many aspects of the Bible, especially places have been verified.
- History – With the aid of archeology and languages, new discoveries presented us of new and better understanding of what the picture is like during the ancient times. We are able to document real historical truth in the Bible and differentiate the non-historical parts of the Bible from the historical.
As a result, we are in a better position to understand the original meaning that the Biblical authors wanted to relay, than any one since the time of Our Lord Jesus Christ. We now have to revise the way we look at the things in the Bible, that the Bible may not be a myth after all. That there is history in the Bible, and poetry, poems, parables, stories, drama, fables, and other type of writings. But most of all the messages contained herein have such a profound meaning in the lives of the people during those times and will have the same effect to us in our time.
This type of knowledge about language, archeology, and history may not be necessary for all people to understand. That is why scholars work on these so that in can be presented to us in a better way. The scholars had laid the groundwork for us and it is now for us to fully grasp it’s meaning thru God the Holy Spirit, Our Beloved Ingkong. With the scholars help, we can learn to recognize and understand the literary forms commonly used today.
With the help also of the different translations (again must be translated in the context of the church beliefs and traditions) of the Bible. We can discern the original meaning of the passages. Translations now days are closer to the meaning of the words written long ago. They may provide introductions to the Books of the Bible as well as notes that give historical background and explain difficult passages.
From now on we will follow faithfully the scholarship teachings of the Apostolic Catholic Church and to express views that are keeping with directions set by the Church. But the opinions of the scholars can change as archeologists, linguists, and historians discover new evidence. This should not alarm us. Our faith rests not on the latest speculations of scholars, but on God’s wisdom and authority, which are certain and everlasting because they come from Our Lord Jesus Christ, who “is the same yesterday and today and forever” (Heb 13:8).
Interfaith considerations (The Canon of the Bible):
Old Testament - The canon, or officially accepted list of books in the Hebrew Bible, consists of 24 books according to Jewish reckoning and is divided into three parts: the Law, the Prophets, and the Writings. The Law (Torah), often called the Pentateuch, comprises five books, Genesis through Deuteronomy. The Prophets (Nevi im) are divided into three parts: the earlier prophets (Joshua, Judges, 1 and 2 Samuel, and 1 and 2 Kings); the later prophets (Isaiah, Jeremiah, and Ezekiel); and twelve books called the Minor Prophets because of their brevity. The 11 Writings (Ketuvim) include three poetic books (Psalms, Proverbs, and Job); the five scrolls (Song of Solomon, Ruth, Lamentations, Ecclesiastes, and Esther); an apocalyptic work, Daniel; and Ezra – Nehemiah and 1 and 2 Chronicles. Christian Bibles arrange the books differently. The Law, or Pentateuch, comes first, then all the historical books. The poetical, or wisdom, books and finally the prophetic books follow these. Thus Ruth, Chronicles, Ezra, Nehemiah, and Esther appear in the second group and Daniel and Lamentations in the fourth.
[Editor's Note: Christian Bibles also generally divide apart all of the separate Books, so the Canon is described as being a total of 39 Books, but which the same text are as the 24 Books of the Hebrew Bible. For example, where the Hebrew Bible counts the Twelve Minor Prophets as one Book, Christian Bibles almost universally count them as twelve Books.]
The Jews never ceased writing religious books. Several books composed in Hebrew or Greek after 300 BC are part of the Septuagint, or Old Greek version, and were regarded as Scripture by many Christians. Roman Catholics and the Orthodox include these books, called Apocrypha or deutero-canonical books, in the Bible. Protestants omit them or print them as an appendix to the Bible.
New Testament – The process by which the canon of the New Testament was formed began in the 2d century, probably with a collection of ten letters of Paul. Toward the end of that century, Irenaeus argued for the unique authority of the portion of the Canon called the Gospels. Acceptance of the other books came gradually. The church in Egypt used more than the present 27 books, and the Syriac speaking churches fewer. The question of an official canon became urgent during the 4th century. It was mainly through the influence of Athanasius, bishop of Alexandria, and because Jerome included the 27 books in his Latin version of the Bible called the Vulgate, that the present canon came to be accepted.
Basing it on the canons of the Bible. A lot has happened to the original Bible. We all knew that the Bible has been written originally in Hebrew, Greek, and Aramaic. The Bible that we use today is translations of the original. The people that translated the original translated it base on their own understanding, knowledge, and religion. Both the West and Eastern Catholics use different translations and approach in studying the Bible. From both Churches there are other independent churches that have translated their own.
The Protestant Church, had exclusively taken some books in their canon. So in a way, when people, even though we are all called Christians, have very much different opinions and understanding on how to interpret the Bible base on their own churches doctrines or understanding. So therefore, when studying the Holy Scripture with other groups beside your same group in your own church. One must be very careful not to have a discussion wherein studying becomes a contest of one owns faith or knowledge. The study of God in the Bible must be understood in the way God had presented himself to all of us, which is humility and love.
Deciphering abbreviations and Biblical references:
Deciphering – The usual way of giving a citation from the Bible is first to name the book (often abbreviated): Mt refers to the Gospel of Matthew, 1 Pet to the First Letter of Peter. Next comes a number, indicating the chapter. Mt 2 would mean the Gospel of Matthew, Chapter 2. The chapter number is followed by a punctuation mark of some kind (usually a colon, but sometimes a comma or a period), after which come more numbers signifying the verses. Thus, Mt 2:19-23 means the Gospel of Matthews, Chapter 2, and Verses 19 to 23.
If the citation refers to more than one chapter, it is printed Mt 2:19-3:16, meaning the Gospel of Matthew, Chapter 2, Verse 19 through Chapter 3, Verse 6. Sometimes specific verses within the same chapter are referred to while others are skipped. A comma is used to indicate verses that are skipped. For example, 1 Kings 2:1-4, 10-11 refers to the First Book of Kings, Chapter 2, Verses 1 to 4 and 10 to 11. (Verses 5 to 9 are omitted).
This system may seem confusing at first, but it becomes easier as the reader becomes familiar with the Bible and with the process of looking up passages. From this point on, all biblical citations will be given using abbreviations found in the Catholic Edition Bibles. Other Bibles may use slightly different abbreviations, and some versions of the Bible may occasionally vary numbering of selected verses and chapters. The reader usually finds these chapters and verses by looking in the general area of the passage that has been cited.
Bible references – Further assistance in reading the Bible can be found in many available Bible Study (Catholic Editions is highly recommended and authorized) aids. A Bible Commentary (Saint Jerome Commentary is highly recommended) offers verse-by-verse explanations of Bible passages. A Bible Atlas gives maps showing the world as it was during the various stages of the Old and New Testament history. Atlases may also offer details about daily life in ancient times. A concordance lists each occurrence of every word in the Bible and gives the chapter and verse where the word may be found. A Bible dictionary offers explanations for important words, names, and places in the Bible. Audiotapes of the Bible make the Holy Bible available for those who can’t read or reading is not available or convenient to them. Computer programs available for many versions of the Bible allow user to access any word or verse and permit comparisons of versions in parallel columns on the computer screen. Worldwide web/Internet information about the Bible can be accessed from everywhere that this is available for quick reference and studies. Also there are paid and non-paid courses available that people can enroll and learn about the Bible.
There are literally thousands of books offering information about the Bible. Some of them are very helpful and in conformity with Catholic teaching. Other materials, even some that claims to be nondenominational, contradict our doctrines and attack the established Catholic faith. You yourselves may judge the value of these materials whenever you come across one. You can look at these nondenominational books through the library, browsing through the Internet or if you want to buy them. Once you do decide, please bear in mind that to truly understand the Bible you must, allow yourselves to have the wisdom of God (Our Beloved Ingkong, God the Holy Spirit) overcome you. And that you can only interpret these through the Church founded by Our Lord Jesus Christ.
In studying the Bible, we therefore need to do three (3) things. Namely, 1) Scholarly research (which from the following paragraphs below will truly explain); 2) The Canon of the Bible; and 3) Deciphering its contents. All three boils down into what the Bible ought to be understood, in its historical context, and then apply it into ones spiritual understanding. So we go now to the core of this article.
ONE HAS TO REMEMBER, The Bible is a historical book. It is not the same as a fairy tale book (Cinderalla) or “made for movie” type genre (Shrek). Rather, it is a historical book, but within it is also, “Mens, spiritual guide book”, which is very much rooted in history. A writer, Ernst Renan once said that “all history is incomprehensible without Christ.” But it is also true that both Christ and the Scriptures are in the same way inexplicable without the historical background adjacent to which they are presented.
History is the study of the past, particularly the written record of the human race, but more generally including scientific and archaeological discoveries about the past. Recently, there has been an increased interest in oral histories and traditions, passed down from generation to generation verbally. New technology, such as photography, sound recording, and motion pictures, now complement the written word in the historical record.
The word history derives from the Greek ??????? (historia), “learning by inquiry” and that from ??????? (histore?), “to examine, to observe, to inquire”, in turn from ????? (hist?r), “a wise man, and one who knows right, a judge”.
If indeed, based on the paragraphs above, the question now is this. Is the Bible accurate in its historical authenticity?
Hopefully the following paragraphs will enable you to have the basic understanding and ultimately answer for yourself, some of the questions that are hanging in your mind about the Bible’s accuracy.
But before you do, the Apostolic Catholic Church stand will always be, that the Bible is accurate and authentic, because we know from our faith that it is the written Word of God handed down to human authors through divine inspiration by God the Father, Yahweh; that it became flesh through God the Son, Our Lord Jesus Christ for its fulfillment; and authenticated by God the Holy Spirit, Mahal na Ingkong through His Prophet’s and Saint’s.
Again, history is the written record of the past, and the study of it requires scientific (science) and archeological (archeology) discoveries. This article will also now in general terms answer your other added questions (which do keep on showing up in our head) about two things:
1) Do science, contradicts the Bible?
2) Do archeology, contradicts the Bible?
Before we proceed, let us define, differentiate, and in the case of our discussion, “what makes archeology a science?
Science (from the Latin scientia, meaning “knowledge“) is the effort to discover, understand, or to understand better, how the physical world works, with observable physical evidence as the basis of that understanding. It is done through observation of natural phenomena, and/or through experimentation that tries to simulate natural phenomena under controlled conditions. Knowledge in science is gained through research. Academically, history is the field of research producing a continuous narrative and a systematic analysis of past events of importance to the human race,
therefore.
Archaeology is one of the newer branches of sciences in the field of research and systematic analysis. The word itself takes us back to ancient times. “Arche” is the Greek word for “beginning.” Archaeology therefore is the study of beginnings. Below are some of the newer definitions that have been already proposed by the scientific community.
1. It is a science in the study of history from the remains of early human cultures as researched primarily by systematic excavations (i.e. Etymology and/or Anthropology).
2. The systematic and descriptive study of antiquities (ancient times) via the exploration (excavations) of the remains of past humans.
3. That division of historical research which investigates past civilizations from extant art, architecture, monuments, inscriptions literature, language, customs, and other material traces.
Now take a look at number 3. It actually tells us the subdivisions of what type of information is needed in order for a person studying history needs to fully understand it. In studying the Bible for any science (scientific truth), one has to study its archeology. This study is called, Biblical Archeology.
Biblical archaeology is the science of archaeology that throws light upon the understanding of the Bible. Which in part, in the study of the Bible, our Biblical archaeology will be primarily focused in the study of the culture and history of the Middle East and the Mediterranean world (specifically the countries within Eastern Asia up to India, Northern Africa, and Southern Europe) – that area which served as the historical context for the Bible.
REASONS FOR STUDYING BIBLICAL ARCHAEOLOGY
- To Aid us in Understanding the Bible.
a. Each book of the Bible was written to a particular audience:
o Genesis is written to Israelites who have come out of Egypt.
o Judges is written to Israelites living under the monarchy of Israel.
o Chronicles is written to post-exilic Jews returning to the land.
o The epistles are written to various churches throughout the Roman
Empire.
In each case, the human author of the book assumes a certain amount of a prior knowledge. He assumes that he can speak of various geographic or cultural areas and that they will be known and understood and applied by his readers. Our problem is that we are reading ancient Scriptures from a 21st century vantage point. A study of Biblical archaeology helps us to step into the sandals of the original readers and to interpret the Scriptures properly. It is only then that we will be able to apply the truths of the Scriptures rightly in our day.
NOTE: It answer’s the question, “Why read the Bible? Is it really God’s Words”?
- To Affirm the Scriptural Narrative.
The Bible’s historical accuracy has long been the source of attack. These attacks have not abated in recent years; they have escalated in intensity. One of the necessary fields of Biblical apologetics will be the defense of the historical veracity of the Bible. The battlefield for this conflict will be the arena of Biblical archaeology.
Make no mistake, this is no easy conflict. There are many archaeologists who reject the Bible out of hand, going so far as to deny the historicity of the patriarchs, the Exodus event and the existence of David or Solomon and their kingdoms.
At the same time, we must realize that there are many things in the Bible which are not substantiated in current Biblical archaeology. That is because we have only found a small fraction of the remains of antiquity.
Principle: The absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. This has been proven time and time again as new finds have substantiated areas which were previously thought to be in error.
NOTE: It answer’s the question, “Is God the Author of the Bible”?
- To Aid us in the Work of Bible Translation.
Language is not a constant. It is always changing. One has only to pick up a King James Bible to see how much the English language has changed over the past 400 years. What it true of the English language is also true of the languages in which the Bible was written.
o The Old Testament was written primarily in Hebrew with a few chapters in Daniel being penned in Aramaic. Modern Hebrew has gone through some changes and there are a number of words in the Old Testament which are “hapax legomenon” – words which appear only once and which appear nowhere else.
How are we to determine the meanings of such words? It is the field of archaeology which provides assistance. Archaeological writings give us other examples of the usage of certain words and are a great help in interpreting the Bible.
o The New Testament is written in Koine Greek. The Greek of the New Testament is very different from the modern Greek which is spoken today. Fortunately, we have a great deal of examples of Koine Greek to compare with our New Testament vocabulary.
NOTE: It answer’s the question, “What does the Bible mean to your faith and to whom it is written for”?
THE SCOPE OF BIBLICAL ARCHAEOLOGY
The lands of the Bible go far beyond the tiny boarders of the land of Israel. The story of the Bible begins in Mesopotamia, the land between the Tigris and Euphrates Rivers. By the end of the New Testament, our horizons have been stretched westward all the way to Spain. This means that we could divide Biblical Archaeology into two distinct parts:
Old Testament Archaeology
The lands of the Old Testament would be those around the Fertile Crescent. This is a large band of relatively fertile land stretching from the Persian Gulf northward along the courses of the Tigris and Euphrates Rivers and then south along the Levant. Though known as the “Fertile Crescent,” much of these lands can only be considered fertile when compared to the surrounding deserts.
New Testament Archaeology
Although still centered in the land of Palestine, our focus in the New Testament turns its attention westward. The story of Acts and the Epistles is a movement from Jerusalem to Rome. Between these two periods is a time known as the “Silent Years.” It is a period when there were no prophets in Israel. But it is not a period which is silent with reference to history.
|
Old Testament
|
|
New Testament
|
|
1600+ Years of History
|
400 “Silent Years”
|
70-90 Years of History
|
|
Centered on the Fertile Crescent
|
|
Centered on the Mediterranean World
|
The Jewish writings known as the “Apocrypha” and specifically the books of Maccabees were written during this period. The books of Maccabees are an excellent resource in filling in for us the historical details of what took place in Israel between the close of the Old Testament Scriptures and the beginning of the New Testament.